Hi, what I noticed regarding the d-i access since a few months: We all agree how the result should be (we approve the current status). However, we were argueing if that is a technical meassure, and why.
As put down in some other decisions already, almost any aspect has technical and non-technical aspects and implications. That is true for even mostly technical issues like devmapper access rights. So, my question is: How can we streamline this? I want to get the issues resolved, and not argueing if we reject it for (a) being non-technically, or (b) not useful. I don't have any proper idea right now, with keeping the split on technical issue to the TC, and non-technical to the DPL. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
