* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 15:21]: > In essence, what we're dealing with here is an artifact of naming. There's > ffmpeg the binary, ffmpeg the shared library, and ffmpeg the internal > module of mplayer. With the current development efforts, each of those > three has valid reasons to exist, but in terms of packaging I think the > shared > library should be thought of as a fork of the internal module. > > I can see changing this point of view, should the development scene > change. But I do not see that this is worth release critical status > if we don't have any decent development effort track record to fall > back on.
Well, the release team already decided that this is not RC for etch, and for lenn, we will see. I think letting the relevant teams redecide in case they think the sitution changed is a good thing, so I don't see need for TC decisions here either. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
