Hi Sven, On Sun Jun 24, 2007 at 08:05:10 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > There is still no reason to close this bug, and no reason to not create > a libstdc++ .udeb. > > Furthermore, the decision of the d-i team on this was highly > overshadowed by their personal vendetta against me, and not based on > technical argumentation. In particular, it was based on the sole > decision of Frans Pop, and we all know he has not acted exemplarily on > this. > > The fact that you chose to close this bug now, because i have been > expulsed in a way debian should be most ashamed of, shows that your > decision is only marginally guided by technical reasons.
You opened a bug against the ctte, which is your perfect right as Debian Package Maintainer. With this bug you asked for technical advice from the ctte team. The ctte had it's discussion from May 17th, 2006 whereas in the end Bdale Garbee called for a vote on June 22nd, 2007. The outcome of the vote (as outlined by Bdale in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) is that the committee endorses choice 2, and libstdc++ udeb should not be created despite bug #367709. I see no misstake in the whole procedure. You asked for advice, they voted, the outcome was quite clear, case closed for the ctte. Please respect the outcome of their vote, as you yourself asked for it. Please try to understand that you should accept their oppinion even though they didn't vote in favour for your wish. Such things happen, in Debian as well as in politics. Greetings Martin PS: i set the reply-to to debian-project and will (as listmaster) accept answers from you to that thread there, as long as they stay on technical stuff, and are not personal insults against any member of the Debian Project. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
