On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:23:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > FreeBSD 6.2, Jan 2007: stable, but not rule 9 > Fedora Core 5, March 2005: stable > Ubuntu 7.04, April 2007: rule 9 > Debian 3.1, sarge (June 2005): not stable > OS X 10.4 Tiger (April 2005): not stable > Windows 2003: stable, but not rule 9
So, to sum this up, we have 3 types: 1: stable, rule 9 2: not stable 3: stable, but not rule 9 So far, all those we know about that implment rule 9 are based on glibc. We've seen that FreeBSD is reported both as 2 and 3. I think it's higly likely that all those OSs reported as 3 are behind a caching nameserver that doesn't rotate and are really type 2. It would be nice if we could collect information about other OSs too. But I don't think it's really relevant. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
