* Kurt Roeckx: > - A simular case is that you have 2 segments, 1.0.0.0/24 and 1.0.1.0/24, > and you add a 1.0.0.2 and 1.0.1.2. Now you want clients to connect > to the one from it's own segment, and fall back to the other if it > fails. > > In this case rule 9 might be useful. But I would rather see that this > fall under rule 2 and/or 8, and that such address would be considered > one with a site-local scope. It could potentially also fall under > rule 4. It's also something that can perfectly be configured in the > policy.
Scope is not defined for IPv4 addresses (neither in RFC 3484 or elsewhere), so Rule 2 and Rule 8 do not apply in this case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
