* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [071001 02:14]: > If the maintainer doesn't do the actual work, we have normal NMU rules that > let non-maintainers fix bugs. I think those are sufficient, and if they > aren't I don't think we can bootstrap legitimacy here by including it in a > TC ruling.
I think we could add legitimacy - but I perfer to do that only if really necessary. (But we don't need to discuss it here for me, I'm happy enough with just not explicitly authorizing an NMU.) > Well, it's with AJ's earlier suggestion in mind that I suggested a concrete > patch be included in this discussion. If we're asked to make a technical > decision, why leave any ambiguity about the implementation? Because if the glibc people find a better implementation, they should be free to do it. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
