* Anthony Towns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [071001 03:46]: > One of the rules for RCness is "in the package maintainer's opinion, > makes the package unsuitable for release". Not quite the same, but > not very different is "in the technical committee's opinion, makes the > package unsuitable for release" -- is that what we think of this issue?
I don't see which advantage we will get from introducing the concept "RC ness" into this decision. AFAICS, we can perfectly well make a decision only about the topic in question. > If it isn't, I'm not seeing why we need to overrule the maintainer instead > of waiting for an updated RFC to be issued with better guidelines that can > be adopted by upstream, and implemented in Debian with the maintainers' > consent. If we don't want to wait so long, afaics we should help get an > updated RFC out. If the decision is right, why should we wait for a new document? Especially as the current document isn't a standard either, but the old behaviour is. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
