On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > I'm calling on votes now for these three options (the last one isn't a > proposal, but by default in the option set). According to the > consitution, the voting periode last for up to one week, or until the > outcome is no longer in doubt. > > | 1. Keep /usr/local writeable by group staff (i.e. leave things as they > | are). > > | 2. Decide to change the default so that /usr/local is not writeable by > | group staff anymore. This change should only be implemented after an > | appropriate transition plan exists which enables system administrators > | to maintain the ability of group staff to write to /usr/local. > | (Reasons for the change are the adaption of other tools like sudo on > | most sites, and the concept of "least surprise" for novice users.) > > | 3. Further discussion. >
I vote:
2, 1, 3
manoj
--
"If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for everything." Jeff
Stiles, Southern Baptist preacher
Manoj Srivastava <[email protected]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
pgpxNGPaZaWNS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
