On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:09 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Russ Allbery ([email protected]) [090729 21:33]: > > Andreas Barth <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > As this is, I tend to the following resolution > > > > > > 1. The Technical Committee refuses to overrule the udev maintainer, as > > > requested by Bug 539158. The committee suggests that the policy > > > maintainers document in the policy what the current best practices on > > > providing printf (and similar functions used in the initrd like [ and > > > test) by shells. > > > > > > (2. Further discussion as default option) > > > > Yup, that sounds right to me as well. There is a long-standing Policy bug > > about the handling of built-ins in general (and a huge lack of time on my > > part at the moment), so this is a known buggy area, but Policy feels like > > the right place to handle it. > > As in-person discussions with Don, Ian and Steve pointed in the same > direction, I intend to call on votes on that text later today unless > somebody disagrees.
I agree. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
