X-Loop [email protected]: Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]> Resent-Sender: [email protected] X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 535645 X-Debian-PR-Package: tech-ctte X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by [email protected] id=B535645.125064924130108 (code B ref 535645); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 535645) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2009 02:34:01 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 24; hammy, 114; neutral, 60; spammy, 3. spammytokens:0.987-1--grievance, 0.973-+--satisfaction, 0.939-+--research hammytokens:0.000-+--H*r:nullmailer, 0.000-+--H*u:1.5.18, 0.000-+--H*UA:2008-05-17, 0.000-+--H*u:2008-05-17, 0.000-+--H*UA:1.5.18 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1Mdazx-0007of-7T; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:34:01 +0000 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (archimedes.ucr.edu [138.23.92.79]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n7J2Xx3j016890; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:34:00 -0700 Received: (nullmailer pid 19093 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:33:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:33:54 -0700 From: Don Armstrong <[email protected]> To: Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]>, [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Mail-Followup-To: Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]>, [email protected] References: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
tag 535645 moreinfo thanks On Sun, 09 Aug 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > I'm writing to you in the hope that you can facilitate resolving a > grievance I have with Joerg Jaspert in his roles as ftp-master and his > decision to remove ia32-libs-tools in the name of "The Project". [...] > Please help me understand why Joerg just removed my package and > hopefully revert that decision. My understanding is that the CTTE was asked first to clarify the reasoning surrounding the removal of ia32-libs-tools et al.; and only take up discussions with regards to overriding the decision afterwards. Goswin: have the reasons for removal been clarified to your satisfaction, or do you still want the CTTE to consider overriding the ftpmasters? [If the latter, I'd suggest summarizing the discussion to date as succinctly as possible, with the issues that lead to the removal and your position on the severity and/or possible mitigation and elmination of those issues. Otherwise, one of us will have to, and that'll take longer.] Don Armstrong -- To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research. -- Steven Wright http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
