Andreas Barth writes ("Re: Bug#573745: Please decide on Python interpreter
packages maintainership"):
> * Ian Jackson ([email protected]) [100705 15:02]:
> > I wrote:
> > > I don't think we are considering adding an additional layer of
> > > management. Currently the person in charge is Matthias; he is the
> > > maintainer of python2.6 et al.[1]
>
> Plus Scott Kitterman and Piotr O?arowski.
I was looking at the Maintainer field of the packages in unstable.
I'd be happy to add Scott and Piotr to my list.
> I don't think that's a coherent team, at least none I would like to be
> the maintainer of the python packages. I need to admit that I don't
> think that either Josselin nor Bernd are capable to do that proper. I
> have no strong opinion on the others yet, which also means I don't
> think they should make them the maintainers. (I think if we do a
> change we should be convinced it gets better.)
At the moment we have a maintainer who never replies to emails, at
least in public.
I think ultimately what we need to do is empower the people currently
doing most of the work.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
