Hello Steve, On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 23:34, Steve Langasek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:02:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >> The existing maintainer has not discussed this matter in public with >> us nor made any public comment. I personally have had no >> communication with the existing maintainer. There have been a few >> indirect personal conversations with some people that I know of, but >> these have not produced conclusions. > > This suggests a form of default judgement, penalizing one party for "failing > to appear" before the TC. However, the stated duties of a maintainer don't > include defending one's maintenance practices before the TC; while it makes > our work harder to adjudicate without the maintainer's input, I'm not > willing to make a political statement like this with my TC vote. > > Furthermore, among those who've had indirect personal conversations with > Matthias is Bdale, a member of the TC; and the only members of the TC who > have cc:ed Matthias in this discussion have been Bdale and Andi. If further > comment is required from Matthias, I don't think enough has been done to > make this clear to him.
Mh, even if I think he is informed of the appeal, and if he wanted to reply he could have done already , I'll take the blame for not cc-ing Matthias in all the reply I send complaining for his lack of comments, so I'm trying to rectify it now. Matthias, I've just added explicitly added in the loop of this CTTE latest branch of discussion: may you please summarize here your position, maybe also discussion some of the several points arose during the discussion? (I don't make any other comments since I made my self enough enemies for today :) ). Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
