On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:20:55PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader
> LILO"):
> > No, I don't think so. There's nothing more to be said.
> >
> > > [for reference:
> > >
> > > A. lilo should be removed. In the meantime, William is to be sole
> > > maintainer of lilo. His promised request to the ftp team to
> > > remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
> > > not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
> > >
> > > B. lilo should be retained in unstable. Matt and Joachim are to be
> > > joint maintainers of lilo.
> ...
> > I vote:
>
> I'm changing my vote as follows:
>
> 1: B
> 2: A
> 3: SQ
I'd like to point out that neither of your votes are signed.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
