debian-ctte  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename Laurent Bigonville
  • Re: Bug#908681: libsane1: pointless package rename John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Bug#911225: tech-ctte: Advice on stale libraries in a higher-precedence path entry Simon McVittie
  • Bug#911225: tech-ctte: Advice on stale libraries in a higher-precedence path entry Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#911225: marked as done (tech-ctte: Advice on stale libraries in a higher-precedence path entry) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Next Meeting - Wednesday, October 17th 19:00 UTC (tomorrow) Margarita Manterola
• Bye Bye Debian - Pass to DevOne Paolo LX
• Next Meeting - Wednesday, September 19th 19:00 UTC (tomorrow) Margarita Manterola
• Next Meeting - Wednesday, August 15th 19:00 UTC (tomorrow) Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting - Wednesday, August 15th 19:00 UTC (tomorrow) Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
• Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Sean Whitton
  • Processed: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Anthony DeRobertis
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Stuart Prescott
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Simon McVittie
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Michael Biebl
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Michael Biebl
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Michael Biebl
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Sam Hartman
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Simon McVittie
  • Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Bug#904558: What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#904558: marked as done (What should happen when maintscripts fail to restart a service) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Processed: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Bdale Garbee
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Stuart Prescott
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Colin Watson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Raphael Hertzog
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Guillem Jover
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Re: Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Stuart Prescott
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Simon McVittie
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Paul Gevers
  • Bug#904302: Notification about TC discussion on possible deprecation of dpkg vendor specific patch series Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: That's a free software issue! Anonymous
  • Bug#904302: That's a free software issue! Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: That's a free software issue! Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive David Bremner
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive David Bremner
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Sam Hartman
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Sam Hartman
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive [and 1 more messages] Sam Hartman
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Iain Lane
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Ian Jackson
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Sean Whitton
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Wouter Verhelst
  • Bug#904302: Why outlawing vendor-specific patch series would be a bad idea Yves-Alexis Perez
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Philip Hands
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Niko Tyni
  • Bug#904302: Call for vote on disallowing the use dpkg's vendor series in the archive Chris Lamb
  • Bug#904302: marked as done (Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#904302: CTTE decision on vendor-specific patch series (bug #904302) Sean Whitton
• Next Meeting: Wednesday, July 18th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, July 18th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, July 18th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Philip Hands
• Next Meeting: Wednesday, June 20th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, June 20th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
• Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Margarita Manterola
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Next Meeting: Wednesday, May 16th 19:00 UTC (today) - Currently no topics Ian Jackson
• Mar 2018 TC meeting is at 'Wed Mar 21 19:00:00 UTC 2018' Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
• tech-ctte BTS usercategories Niko Tyni
  • Re: tech-ctte BTS usercategories Don Armstrong
• Bug#893200: TC Chair election Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#893200: TC Chair election Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#893200: TC Chair election Simon McVittie
  • Bug#893200: TC Chair election Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#893200: TC Chair election Niko Tyni
  • Bug#893200: TC Chair election Niko Tyni
  • Bug#893200: TC Chair election Tollef Fog Heen
  • Bug#893200: TC Chair election Margarita Manterola
  • Bug#893200: marked as done (TC Chair election) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#893200: marked as done (TC Chair election) Philip Hands
• Bug#881339: marked as done (allow node-babel-preset-env to build depend on itself) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#881339: marked as done (allow node-babel-preset-env to build depend on itself) Ian Jackson
  • Bug#881339: marked as done (allow node-babel-preset-env to build depend on itself) Wookey
  • Bug#881339: marked as done (allow node-babel-preset-env to build depend on itself) Philip Hands
• Feb 2018 TC meeting is at 'Wed Feb 21 19:00:00 UTC 2018' Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
• Bug#889493: tech-ctte: Please review if systemd is reliable enough to be the default Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
  • Bug#889493: marked as done (tech-ctte: Please review if systemd is reliable enough to be the default) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#889493: tech-ctte: Please review if systemd is reliable enough to be the default Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
  • Bug#889493: tech-ctte: Please review if systemd is reliable enough to be the default Philip Hands
  • Bug#889493: tech-ctte: Please review if systemd is reliable enough to be the default Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#889493: tech-ctte: Please review if systemd is reliable enough to be the default Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#889493: tech-ctte: Please review if systemd is reliable enough to be the default Gunnar Wolf
• Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Niko Tyni
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Niko Tyni
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Niko Tyni
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Niko Tyni
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Niko Tyni
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Osamu Aoki
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Niko Tyni
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Niko Tyni
  • Re: Bug#887557: www.debian.org: tech-ctte membership updates Laura Arjona Reina
• Bug#886267: Voting for TC Chair Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#886267: Voting for TC Chair Niko Tyni
  • Bug#886267: Voting for TC Chair David Bremner
  • Bug#886267: Voting for TC Chair Gunnar Wolf
  • Bug#886267: Voting for TC Chair Philip Hands
  • Bug#886267: Voting for TC Chair Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#886267: marked as done (Voting for TC Chair) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Dec 2017 TC meeting is at 'Wed Dec 20 19:00:00 UTC 2017' Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Re: Dec 2017 TC meeting is at 'Wed Dec 20 19:00:00 UTC 2017' Philip Hands
• Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Julian Andres Klode
  • Processed: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Don Armstrong
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Ian Jackson
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Andrey Rahmatullin
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Julian Andres Klode
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Don Armstrong
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Andrey Rahmatullin
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Ian Jackson
  • Bug#883573: Reevaluate libpam-systemd systemd-sysv dependency ordering (746578) Julian Andres Klode

• Earlier messages
• Later messages