Christoph Biedl <[email protected]> writes: >> Adding a dependency on makedev will work, but since the makedev package >> is long orphaned and there's rarely any reason to have it installed any >> more, I personally wonder if it wouldn't be better to just add >> appropriate mknod calls directly? > > With all respect, I disagree. > > * This is an NMU, it should be kept as short as possible but already > is way too huge.
Good point. Take my advice as being a post-wheezy suggestion, until/unless the kernel and udev get the device entries for ISDN right. > Aside, policy 10.6 refers to MAKEDEV which is provided by makedev on > static /dev, not to mknod. But that's not a point, the current wording > of 10.6 is mostly historic and therefore more what you'd call > "guidelines" than actual rules. And there's already a better places > to discuss this. Yes. Policy clearly needs to be updated in this area. Bdale
pgpXtGHX6MNnF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
