Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> writes: > Russ Allbery dixit: >> But when providing project-wide guidance, we have an obligation to >> worry about the error conditions as well. If multiple logind >> implementations do *not* materialize, or if they do materialize but >> then people lose interest
> I question why logind is needed in the first place. Current-day systems > are getting way too complex and complicated; we did not need something > like this a few months ago either. The link that Colin posted provides a fairly good summary of why logind is attractive from the perspective of a GNOME maintainer. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
