On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Vincent Bernat <[email protected]> wrote: > ❦ 18 octobre 2014 13:32 +0200, Svante Signell <[email protected]> : > >> In summary, the CTTE is asked to make a decision on debconf warnings on: >> 1) Changing init system on upgrades (including sid) >> 2) Inform about alternate init systems for new installations > > 2 is quite far-fetched. Why not a debconf warning to tell there are > alternatives to nano? And another one to tell there are alternatives to > bash? The installation will take several hours to let the user know > there are alternatives to almost any component.
Well one good reason is that when you install nano or bash, vi/vim/emacs and zsh/fish are not uninstalled. Furthermore, these components are not necessary to boot your system into a stage where you can login, have internet capabilities, and can install or remove packages. The exception to this is when you remove bash, and you get a loud warning at that point. Cheers, -- Cameron Norman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/calzwfrlegcpuv2gi3nrdkuawytwb9wnu2yzmavomrfnopor...@mail.gmail.com
