Joey Hess <[email protected]> writes: > I am astounded that, in #762194, the technical committe has
> 1. Decided it should make a decision, when no disagreement > between maintainers of affected packages is involved. Er, what decision did we make in that bug? The reason why I supported that resolution is that it's *not* a decision. It's a statement that says "hey, we were asked to decide this, but there's a bunch of other stuff going on right now, so here's our plan, and we're not making a decision at this time." With some clarification of what an earlier decision meant, just in case anyone was confused. > 2. Ignored evidence of ongoing work. > (specifically, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762194#25) > 3. Plowed ahead with a vote that decides a massively complicated > issue with a grand total of 3 days of discussion. I really don't believe that it does this. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
