On Aug 30 2015, Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> wrote: > if you actually want the TC to only > choose with no comment from the options before it; if you want us not to > raise objections and actually set policy as we are charged with in the > constitution,
There is an (important) difference between "set policy" and "create policy". I object to the latter, not the former. I am not sure what you mean with "raising objections". Do you mean this as some sort of formal task? I don't think this is anything that the constitution charges the ctte with. Or do mean that you just want to share your personal objections to something as a ctte member? I certainly don't object to that. Though, in any case, I think that: > then you will find absolutely no one willing to serve on > the TC. is a rather strong statement. It's easily disproven by finding someone, and I'm pretty sure that you haven't asked everyone. As a matter of fact, judging from the different kinds and levels of (publicly visible) activity of the sitting ctte members, I would expect that at least some of them would be willing to continue to serve in a ctte that uses its powers a little less creatively[1]. (Replying to ctte list only, this isn't relevant to the bug at hand anymore). Best, -Nikolaus [1] No negative connotation implied. I mean "creative" in the sense of not just picking between the presented options. -- GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«