>>>>> "Wookey" == Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> writes:
>> That is, I disagree with you that I need to address the question >> of htags and figure out whether htags users are being impacted. >> That might have been true for one release. But over a longer >> time frame, the really strong presumption is that we prefer a >> version that is being actively developed to one that isn't. That >> if people won't step forward and maintain htags, it goes awy. Wookey> Just to be clear, you are confusing 'htags' and Wookey> 'htmake/htconfig' (I was too when this started). htags is Wookey> still here, works fine, and is not going away, as Punit Wookey> explained. The thing that is likely to go away is Wookey> 'centralised htags browsing using system webserver' which is Wookey> what Ron's htmake and htconfig provided. No, I'm not:-) Ron claimed or at least I read him as claiming that htags was not very useful without system web browsing. I've said that I'm not commenting on the technical issues, so since I was talking to Ron, I took that claim as a postulate. You've disagreed with that claim elsewhere in the thread. While I do have an opinion, I was not intending to inject it.