Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> Anthony DeRobertis writes ("Re: Bug#862051: Refer #862051 to ctte"):
>> On 07/14/2017 12:57 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> > Fair point.
>> >
>> > 3. Once a new nodejs package providing /usr/bin/node is in the
>> > archive, other packages in the archive are free to depend on the
>> > nodejs package and use /usr/bin/node .
>>
>> That should probably be a versioned Depends, at least until a stable
>> release includes /usr/bin/node in nodejs. Otherwise upgrades may break.
>>
>> OTOH, is this paragraph (or 2, for that matter) really needed? They're
>> just restating (somewhat imperfectly) Policy and/or normal practice in
>> Debian, which presumably come back into effect anyway once the
>> 2012-07-12 decision is repealed.
>
> It would be better to simply say "following Debian's existing backward
> compatibility practices" or something, than trying to restate it all.Quite -- I think we just need to have clause 1 in the resolution itself. We could have some suggestions as additional notes to describe the consequences of the revocation. Like mentioning that where a versioned depends on nodejs is deemed necessary, the Depends: should probably also allow nodejs-legacy as an alternative option, since that also provides /usr/bin/node. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
