Dear all, We said we'd work together to collate responses to our request for input in advance of our BoF and I was meant to get that activity started ten days ago, but I failed to do this. I'm sorry about this -- I've been on a sort-of vacation and haven't been looking at my scheduled tasks in the way I normally would.
I have, however, been gathering message-ids of feedback we received, and this morning I've gone through these and extracted those which I think are broadly in line with our interests and intentions for this reform project, such that we should try to incorporate them into our plan for the talk. I've extracted a few bullet points from each item to make it easier to slot these into a talk plan, but we'd want to reread the actual mail when doing that, rather than relying on my bullet points. id:20200727014620.ko33taa3rwp3o...@qor.donarmstrong.com - still no design work, but ideas and working groups - issue opinions on parameters an ideal solution would have then endorse the design id:20200727182330.ga21...@layer-acht.org - we should carefully explain the "no design work" thing to avoid misunderstanding and sidetracking (incorporate Marga's reply to Holger's message) id:36079a44-9b0e-4836-97f1-6154b830a...@beckenbach.us - explain how we handle non-technical issues at present - explain what is done to mitigate the TC being a nuclear option, plus possibility of using former TC members for this id:tslft9br4yq....@suchdamage.org - when it comes to non-technical issues, we should consider focusing on the problem of replacing maintainers, as we're the only body that can do this - descriptions of how replacing maintainers doesn't work so well atm id:011719ac-d3a1-7dd4-02ad-aeb5b74a3...@debian.org - useful remarks on private discussions - what could go wrong if we allow some way of doing design work [I think Matthew is onto something important here] - separate body which is not one of last resort. There were some other messages which were certainly interesting, but which I didn't think could be actionable within our current conception of the scope of the reform project. But we could come back to them after the current project has concluded. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature