-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:48:53AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: >Hi, > >Andreas, Jonas and me just had a nice real life discussion, which made me send >this mail.... the topic was that one cannot change a written down definition. >(Or at least I think this was the topic :) > >Basically I'm just resending the following two paragraphs, with one term >exchanged...: > > >And IMO, either something is a Debian Subdistribution or not. Thats quite >binary in my opinion :-) > >OTOH, I also think something can be called a Debian Subdistribution, even if >the aim, to be 100% part of Debian has not been achieved yet. As long as >there is this aim and work on this aim is being done.
...which is exactly why I favor the term "pure blend" as a new name for what is currently defined as CDD: you can "blend" (as in stir, shake, sort) the priority of packages to favor postfix over Exim or XFCE over Gnome, but pure can only mean 100% Debian. Good night, and thanks for all the (jelly?)fish! - Jonas - -- IT-guide dr. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dr.jones.dk/ +45 40843136 Debian GNU/Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH9W8On7DbMsAkQLgRApGnAKCM75474zqRZM+raZva8eGpZ3el+gCfcLPS HHNnF2bqqJHOmcxTYgfNL0c= =dno3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
