On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:48:53AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > And IMO, either something is a Debian Subdistribution or not. Thats quite > binary in my opinion :-) > OTOH, I also think something can be called a Debian Subdistribution, even if > the aim, to be 100% part of Debian has not been achieved yet. As long as > there is this aim and work on this aim is being done.
i think it's worth making the distinction between: * completely within debian * making progress towards being entirely within debian * little to no intention of being completely within debian the reason i think it's important is that it gives credit where credit is due, yet makes it clear when a project has work remaining. live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
