On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > subscribe bugnr email > > and > > unsubscribe bugnr email
Already planned. Some of pts will be no longer needed. > *) Create packagename@ alias. > - When an email gets sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a bug number > is create, just as when sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > This way a new user would not have to learn to write pseudo headers. > The pseudo header can still be accepted but is not needed (i.e. optional) > to indicate which package to send to. > - submit@ can still be used but is not needed. Hmm. Interested idea. But perhaps those people should use reportbug or bug. > *) When email is sent to the user and mainainer about a bugnr, the > Reply-To: field should be set to bugnr@ only. Just a matter of editting of templates. > - Users who send information about the bug should automatically be > subscribed > to the bug number. Er, no. > > * Make use of pgp/gpg sigs on mails, to enable various commands. For > > example, this could be used by the Release Manager to tweak certain > > tags/status bits, but disallow these commands for others. > > * Per email/maintainer/package flags. This could be used to keep the > > acks from being sent(#174503). > > That would be a nice thing. The subscription system above would give a > good infrastructure on this, right? The initial submitter gets an > acc (when sending to packagename@ and submit@). In the rest of the time > he/she will get the email back (with some extra text in top/bottom maybe). What you are discussing and what I am discussing are not related.
