On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 12:57:17AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > subscribe bugnr email > > > > and > > > > unsubscribe bugnr email > > Already planned. Some of pts will be no longer needed.
Nice! > > *) Create packagename@ alias. > > - When an email gets sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a bug number > > is create, just as when sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This way a new user would not have to learn to write pseudo headers. > > The pseudo header can still be accepted but is not needed (i.e. > > optional) > > to indicate which package to send to. > > - submit@ can still be used but is not needed. > > Hmm. Interested idea. But perhaps those people should use reportbug or bug. Yes maybe. But sometime (even I had problems using bug and reportbug before I learnt the EMAIL env variable) such tools can be hard to use, at least for a novice. I have not looked at them for half a year or more but "back then" they was a bit hard. > > *) When email is sent to the user and mainainer about a bugnr, the > > Reply-To: field should be set to bugnr@ only. > > Just a matter of editting of templates. Ok. > > - Users who send information about the bug should automatically be > > subscribed > > to the bug number. > > Er, no. Ok, but at least the initial reporter must be automatically subscribed to the bug in order to get all the information to the bts. If not, the reply-to header will not be set properly. > > > * Make use of pgp/gpg sigs on mails, to enable various commands. For > > > example, this could be used by the Release Manager to tweak certain > > > tags/status bits, but disallow these commands for others. > > > * Per email/maintainer/package flags. This could be used to keep the > > > acks from being sent(#174503). > > > > That would be a nice thing. The subscription system above would give a > > good infrastructure on this, right? The initial submitter gets an > > acc (when sending to packagename@ and submit@). In the rest of the time > > he/she will get the email back (with some extra text in top/bottom maybe). > > What you are discussing and what I am discussing are not related. Ok, maybe I was misunderstanding you. :) Regards, // Ola > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
