On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hmm. Interested idea. But perhaps those people should use reportbug or > > bug. > > Yes maybe. But sometime (even I had problems using bug and reportbug > before I learnt the EMAIL env variable) such tools can be hard to use, > at least for a novice. I have not looked at them for half a year or > more but "back then" they was a bit hard.
Then file bugs on them to have them improved. > Ok, but at least the initial reporter must be automatically subscribed to the > bug > in order to get all the information to the bts. If not, the reply-to header > will not be set properly. Why would the initial reporter always be concerned about everything that occurs for a bug? And what does that have to do with setting reply-to? Convince me properly.
