Hallo.
Is it new policy to closed bugs or what? If it is, it's very sad, that i
can't contribute info, replying to users ccing bts, as in reply-to.
== Example: ==
>From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Sep 06 12:00:12 2007
Received: by barikada.upol.cz (Spam Firewall)
id 4E76A6F131; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: MAILER-DAEMON (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the Spam Firewall at barikada.upol.cz.
I'm sorry to inform you that the message below could not be delivered.
When delivery was attempted, the following error was returned.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43] said: 550
unknown user (in reply to RCPT TO command)
--CCDC76F133.1189071904/barikada.upol.cz
Content-Description: Delivery error report
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; barikada.upol.cz
Arrival-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:01 +0200 (CEST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Spam-Firewall; host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43] said:
550 unknown user (in reply to RCPT TO command)
--CCDC76F133.1189071904/barikada.upol.cz
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Received: from flower (flower.upol.cz [158.194.64.22])
by barikada.upol.cz (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP
id 9F8216F131; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:45:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from flower (flower.upol.cz [158.194.64.22]) by barikada.upol.cz with
ESMTP id xb16H6maLRZlQWci; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:45:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from olecom by flower with local (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1ITE9g-0003o1-KT; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:00:08 +0200
To: Leon Bottou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#435723: Some info (printf with %g causes a segmentation violation.)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: slrn + jed (x86_64-pc-linux-glibc-debian)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:00:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Palacky University in Olomouc, experimental physics department
X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-glibc-debian
* Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:16:56 -0400, Leon Bottou:
>
[]
> This segfault is a little bit freaky.
> The value 9.9999999999999991e-05 is important.
> If you take 10e-5, no segfault.
> A debug trace suggests that printf calls wmemset
> with incorrect arguments. I'll try to learn more.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha/12394>
In case if it's useful.
____
--CCDC76F133.1189071904/barikada.upol.cz--
== ==
--
-o--=O`C
#oo'L O
<___=E M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
