On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote: > Should i reopen/post/close? Or additional info just not needed for > "thousands of users and indexing search engines"?
If there's a valid reason to add more information to the bug, or if the bug hasn't actually been fixed, then unarchive it. > On related topic. Is implementing in-reply-to/references checks, > i've mentioned some time ago is no-go for BTS technically? Checks for what? If you're talking about threading in the bugreport.cgi display, that's something I'd like to do, but it's quite a ways down the todo list. If you're talking about munging the messages sent to the bts itself, no, that's not something I'm planning on implementing. Don Armstrong -- We cast this message into the cosmos. [...] We are trying to survive our time so we may live into yours. We hope some day, having solved the problems we face, to join a community of Galactic Civilizations. This record represents our hope and our determination and our goodwill in a vast and awesome universe. -- Jimmy Carter on the Voyager Golden Record http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
