* 06-09-2007, Adam D. Barratt: * X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 * X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 > > Hi,
Hallo. > Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote: >> Hallo. >> >> Is it new policy to closed bugs or what? If it is, it's very sad, >> that i can't contribute info, replying to users ccing bts, as in reply-to. > [...] >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host bugs.debian.org[140.211.166.43] said: >> 550 unknown user (in reply to RCPT TO command) > > Not closed bugs, rather archived bugs. How quickly. Uh, this time... Yes, completely useless archives-on-web is just waste of it, while Gmane is surely kick-ass in reading everything, including backlogs/archives. > And no, it's not new. Archived bugs haven't accepted mail for as long as I > can remember. Of course there was a long period where bugs weren't getting > archived but that was a technical issue rather than policy. Should i reopen/post/close? Or additional info just not needed for "thousands of users and indexing search engines"? While policy problems i left out, subject, to, or other header magic would be fine technically. On related topic. Is implementing in-reply-to/references checks, i've mentioned some time ago is no-go for BTS technically? Thanks. ____ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
