Thomas writes: > It should be every year that the work was published. (If you publish in > year N, then modify and publish the new thing in year M, you should list > both years.)
> There is no harm in listing extra years. There could be if you do so in a way that could be construed as an attempt to fraudulently extend the life of the copyright. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
