'Brian C. White wrote:' > >> > Sorry to bother you again, but I thought non-free was precisely for >> > packages which may not be sold on CDs. Now I am confused. >> >> You're not the only one. For example, shareware programs can be "sold" on CD >> but require payment for use. I'd be more specific, but I can't get to >> "master" at the moment. I'd better send Simon a note... > >This is one of the things I would like to improve about non-free's >organization. It would be a "Good Thing" (tm) in my opinion to at least >differentiate between "non-free to distribute" and "non-free to use".
Umm, "non-free to distribute" shouldn't be on /any/ ftp site, right? -- Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] | UNIX SIG Leader at PACS http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | (Philadelphia Area Computer Society) ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | Design Science Revolutionary "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller | Explorer in Universe
