Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >And I got this back from the anon.petet.fi gateway. The interesting thing is >that my collegue got *exactly* the same mail from the anon.petet.fi gateway >and he sent a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, no Cc:'s.
Ditto with a bug report I sent yesterday to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with no Ccs. + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 30 08:24:52 1996 + Date: Sat, 29 Jun 96 23:01:51 +0300 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] + To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] + Subject: Anonymous service rejected your mail. + + You, [EMAIL PROTECTED], have requested anonymous mail forwarding to + dade. This was rejected, as the user is unknown. + + Contents of message follows: + + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] + X-Anonymously-To: dade + Organization: Anonymous forwarding service + Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] + Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 20:01:50 UTC + Subject: Bug#3443: mechanism for dealing with orphan packages + [...snipped...] Pine saved the following header from the outgoing message: >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 29 06:45:30 1996 Status: O X-Status: Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 06:45:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mechanism for dealing with orphan packages In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
