"Christian Hudon wrote:" > > Package: fvwm > Version: 1.24r-24 > > Fvwm shouldn't recommend (nor even suggest, IMO) another version of > itself (i.e. fvwm2).
Hmm, I'm not so sure. In principle you are correct, but the fvwm2 package has all the pixmaps needed by fvwm-1.24 and fvwm won't run without them (at least not with my .fvwmrc). So unless the packages are reworked there may need to be a /dependency/ on fvwm2. -- Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] | UNIX SIG Leader at PACS http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | (Philadelphia Area Computer Society) ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | Design Science Revolutionary "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller | Explorer in Universe