>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Branden> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:18:20PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: >> This is, what, the fourth or fifth? post from Manoj in reply to one of your >> non-free-debate-related joke. One or two were funny, sure, but I think we've >> all lost the humour bit after the Nth instance, and then Manoj overreacted >> to the whole slew of them. Branden> Well, see, now Manoj would say that none at all were funny. What Branden> statistical conclusions am I to derive from that? Notice that is did not respond to the first few, even though you were ridiculing positions I took, However, there seemed to be no end in sight, and there was no response to my earlier non overreacting messages. Branden> It's been said that self-censorship is the worst form of Branden> censorship. I guess that isn't the case when we're asking Branden> other people to practice it. Is politeness self censorship, then? (that is a pretty damning admission, and one I would have hesitated in levelling against you). manoj -- You will see the light at the end of the tunnel; unfortunately, it will be the light of an oncoming freight train. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C