On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:36:20 +1000, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Even if the bug is for upstream fixing a typo in a comment? :)
>>
>> If it caused a Debian bug to be closed, that is a significant
>> change in status for the Debian package (it may not be for the
>> upstream software being packaged, but it is for my package).
> What if the bug was reported after the new Debian package was
> uploaded? Why does it suddenly stop being a significant change?
Good point. Shall we mandate that all bug closures be
adequately documented in the ChangeLog? I would be quite happy with
that.
Indeed, the rationale would be that closing bugs is an
important event for the Package, and needs be thus documented. I
thank you for pointing out this defect in our ChangeLog
standards.
manoj
--
If all the world is a stage, where is the audience sitting? George
Carlin
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
