Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> SuSv3 aka POSIX was released one year ago. > > And changed nothing in the Lex definitions. As I said, we are > dealing with decades old design.
Hmm you must've missed section 1.1 :) The entire document is aligned with ISO/IEC 9899: 19999. There is no requirement that lex generates code that is accepted by c89. But of course this has no bearing on whether a particular implementation chooses to be backwards compatible or not. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
