Marcelo Magallon said: > You mean you actually think James can even consider the possibility of > handing the management of the keyring over?
Well, he should. He'll have to someday, such as when he dies. (Unless he is actually immortal, or more likely if Debian is utterly destroyed first.) According to the Debian Constitution, he only has mastery over the keyring because he's a "Delegate" appointed by the DPL. You seem to be saying that he should treat it as his personal property, or perhaps a God-given right. That's just odd. It can't be what you meant, can it? :-) Of course he has a right (and duty) to be concerned about who manages the keyring, and to give his opinion about that to the DPL (even if his opinion is that he is the only one who can be trusted), but that's not what you said. -- Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org> http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html