On 02-Mar-05, 07:55 (CST), Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice for occasional no-X booting, e.g. for debugging. But
> then there's still single user mode for that, so "wasting" a whole
> runlevel for it doesn't seem so useful. The "nox" boot parameter seems
> much less intrusive.
Sure, until someone want's 'nonfs', and someone else wants 'nocups', etc.
etc. etc.
Why is that people won't use the working, standard, way to do this?
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
