* Wouter Verhelst | On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:00:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: | > Darren Salt wrote: | > >I demand that Anthony Towns may or may not have written... | > >>Put them behind a firewall on a trusted LAN, use them to develop software | > >>for arm chips, and then just follow unstable or run non-security-supported | > >>snapshots. Apart from writing software for embedded arm things, I can't | > >>see | > >>the value | > >"Linux desktop box" comes to mind... | > | > But why would you spend over 1000 pounds on an arm Linux desktop box | > instead of a few hundred pounds on a random i386 desktop box? | | Because it's cool. In both senses of the word (have you ever had to | measure the temperature of an i386 box?)
(amd64, but I guess the point still applies): : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > acpi -V Thermal 1: ok, 26.0 degrees C I think the room temperature is 19°C. : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > acpi -V Thermal 1: ok, 34.0 degrees C (This is my home box, so a little less air circulation there.) Not exactly hot, are they? -- Tollef Fog Heen ,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]