On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:47:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Therefore, all GPL'd programs will have to go to non-free.
there's nothing that prevents us from re-distributing modified copies
of the GPL, we just can't do so and claim that they are the GPL. even
if you did want to nitpick that (why?), such a restriction is acceptable
according to the DFSG. for example, many authors choose to license
their software under a 'modified GPL' or 'GPL-with-some-exceptions'.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
