On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:18:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I cannot think of any other options. I'm short of clues for the best > > way of doing this, and I'd be happy to give access to the svn repository > > of people who could help and work on it together. > I imagine these libraries are fairly small, and therefore IMHO there's no > real reason to create a separate -pic package for each. However, you do > need to provide the library in PIC form if you're going to be linking to it > from other packages that provide DSOs (i.e., perl and python modules). I > would suggest simply bundling a libfoo_pic.a (static, PIC) library in the > respective -dev package.
Wow! Thanks, thanks, thanks Steve, this sounds quite ideal. Now I'll have to figure out the automake/autoconf machinery to have that working, but at least now I have quite clear what needs to be done. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
