On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:28, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why would it be desirable to have arch-os directories under libexec?
On fedora-devel Bill Nottingham suggested having /usr/lib vs /usr/lib64 for programs that care about such things and /usr/libexec for programs that don't. > 32bit mozilla with flash plugin and 64bit mozilla without. A lot of > people seem to want that. Bill's idea seems to work in that case. Although as you would need different names in /usr/bin it might make sense to just name the libexec files with the same extension as the file in /usr/bin that launches them. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]