Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't personally care on /usr/lib vs. /usr/libexec, except that the idea > of going through and changing all the packages in Debian really doesn't > appeal to me (and however easily spread that cost, it's a lot of work -- > it's more work than the /usr/doc migration, and that was a PITA). I do > care a *lot* about consistency. Having a mix of /usr/lib and /usr/libexec > is, in my opinion, significantly worse than either one or the other.
Most packages had files in /usr/doc. Most packages do not have files in /usr/lib at all, and most of those that do, wouldn't need to be changed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]