On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > <quote who="John Goerzen" date="2005-06-07 09:48:47 -0500"> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > > > <quote who="John Goerzen" date="2005-06-01 09:06:50 -0500"> > > > > That sounds very nice indeed. If that pans out, and you also fix the UI > > > > issues (by which I mean I have to type approximately three times as many > > > > characters to accomplish the same thing that I do in darcs), that would > > > > be very nice. > > > > > > It blows my mind that people actually use tla or baz without very good > > > shell completions. The lack of shell completions kept me from > > > switching to baz for weeks. ;) > > > > IMHO, it's a bug if it doesn't work efficiently without specialized > > assistance from shell completions. > > Absolutely. The fact that such a workaround is essential is a sign of > serious problem. :) tla has those in force. :) > > > For my own part, I've found the tla completion support to generally be > > buggy and not all that helpful. > > The zsh completions for tla has treated me quite well. Bazaar is > moving fast enough that it breaks pretty frequently.
I had a perl script that parsed tla --help output to produce bash completions. Was rather complete on the completions it supported(per-command options/values, etc). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]