Benjamin Mesing wrote: > Meelis Roos wrote: > > JFSP> - Separate runlevels: 2 for multi, no net, 3 for multi no X, 4 for X, > > 4=5 > > > > Why? Display manager as a normal service that can be started and stopped > > like other services is very natural. No need to confuse the users with > > more runlevels since there's not much point in differentiating them > > nowadays. > Two points come to my mind. > 1. in case your X-Config is broken booting in runlevel 3 offers a > nice way to fix this
How will switching to run level 3 fix this problem? Your X config is still broken. If your X configuration is broken and your X won't start then that is effectively the same thing as the proposed run level 3 anyway. So what is the point? > 2. it is defined in the LSB Can't argue with that. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]