* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 16:50]: > * Andreas Barth [Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:54:29 +0200]: > > The packages.d.o-addresses are a really useful tool for contacting > > multiple maintainers e.g. for transitions. They were quite helpful > > during e.g. the release of sarge. > > There are plans to merge @packages.d.o and @packages.QA.d.o, so that > both reach the maintainer and the PTS subscribers. The QA address > requires the presence of an X-PTS-Approved header to let a message > reach <package>@p.q.d.o, but I never asked Frank what his plans about > this wrt the merge were. > > If @packages.d.o addresses are really such a big source of spam, we > could require the header for both domains, which isn't _that_ > disruptive if we assume most users of @p.d.o addresses are developers, > and not end users.
Well, that would work for me, yes. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
