Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 13:12 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva a écrit : > Why not simply puting the loader inside the library package? If the > loader should always be together with the library, then make them one > package and be done with it. > > I may be missing something obvious, but I don't see the point of having > a -commong package in this case.
If the library SONAME changes, the loader's filename doesn't need to change. However, in this case, the two versions of the library must be able to be installed together, so the loader has to be in a different package. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
