On 7/18/05, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:06:13AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 03:19:54PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > > > this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is > > > your package that is "broken". of course you could still file a > > > > The same issues as with libcurl applied to libldap2. They were > > considered a bug in libldap2 back then because half the distribution > > links it. Gave me a lot of recurring head aches. > > yes, and the same with libmysqlclient, which is why there's no longer ssl > support in the mysql packages :(
Wouldn't it be possible to support SSL transparently in such a way that the original package doesn't need to be modified?