On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:34:16AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Aug 04, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would also like to understand. 2.6.12 being available doesn't help. > > The package remains un-upgradable from sarge or etch. > Sarge or etch do not have newer versions of udev to upgrade to.
but you can't suffer a bug that prevents its migration ? > > As Manoj and Blars said, solutions would be to have either one package > > with both versions, or one package for each. > And as I explained, such a package would not work. you explained nothing, you just told us it would be a mess, while others were proposing to do the work. > > Constructive and fruitful discussions with Marco led him to the > > conclusion that such solutions would be too much hassle to maintain. > Wrong. as you can imagine, i am *not* asking for *your* opinion, which i know. given the amplitude of the change, you could have thought about raising this on -devel yourself. i would also like to stress that requiring users to upgrade their kernel looks truly rude to me. besides it means rebooting, many users have home cooked kernels and other modules that they would like to keep. cheers, piem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
